Follow Us
Back to Home

Communication for Development (C4D) & Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC): Complete Implementation Guide for Sustainable Social Transformation

Changing Conditions, Not Just Knowledge. Partner with Responsenet to design and implement evidence-based SBCC programs that create lasting social transformation across health, education, and development sectors.

šŸ“§ Email: [email protected]  |  šŸ“ž Call: +91 9910737524 / 9810007524

"Providing people with information and teaching them how they should behave does not lead to desirable change in their response or behavior. However, when there is a supportive environment with information and communication, then there is desirable change in the behavior of the target group."

— Foundational Principle of SBCC

Responsenet uses a variety of approaches to practice Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC). Our key strategy is to collaborate with families and community leaders to understand their needs and motivations, discover their strengths, and remove barriers to positive change. We believe it is essential to change the conditions in which people act rather than just changing people's knowledge. For over 17 years, Responsenet has been a leader in social and behavioral change with a strong organizational workforce on the ground across India.

What is Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC)?

Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC)—also known as Communication for Development (C4D)—is the purposeful use of communication strategies to influence shifts in knowledge, attitudes, norms, beliefs, and behaviors. It is a research-based, consultative process that uses communication to promote and facilitate behavior change and support the requisite social change for improving health and development outcomes.

Unlike traditional Information-Education-Communication (IEC), SBCC goes beyond materials production to strategically designed, evidence-based interventions. The goal is to create a supportive atmosphere that allows people to begin, develop, and maintain beneficial and desirable behavior outputs appropriate to their societal settings.

Key Principles of Effective SBCC

šŸŽÆ Two-Way Communication

SBCC is an interactive process requiring feedback and improvement from the intended audience—not one-way broadcasting of messages.

šŸ“Š Evidence-Based Design

Strategies are based on well-established behavioral intervention theories and models, beginning with primary research of specific social settings and behavioral analysis.

šŸŽØ Tailored Messaging

All creative messages and products are informed by in-depth knowledge of the intended audience. Beneficiaries are carefully segmented and materials pre-tested.

šŸ“ˆ Measurement Systems

Monitoring changes in attitudes and behaviors helps measure impact against program objectives. Communication objectives should be measurable and linked to results.

The Social Ecological Model: Understanding Behavior at Multiple Levels

Behavior is a complicated phenomenon impacted by elements both within and beyond the individual. The Social Ecological Model (SEM), based on Urie Bronfenbrenner's foundational work from 1979, acknowledges that individuals develop within a network of relationships and are affected by a complex range of social influences and nested environmental interactions. SBCC operates at four interconnected levels that interact to impact behavior:

LevelDescription, Example & SBCC Tactics
1ļøāƒ£ IndividualDescription: At this level, behavior is impacted by the inculcated personal traits of a person: knowledge, attitudes, skills, emotions, beliefs, self-efficacy, and perceived risk.
Example: During a disease outbreak, individuals must understand the hazards of transmission and how to prevent it. They must recognize that they are at risk and have the ability and confidence to exercise preventative measures.
SBCC Tactics: Health education, skill-building workshops, counseling, mobile health messages, personalized risk communication.
2ļøāƒ£ Family & Peer Networks
(Interpersonal)
Description: Individuals are most impacted by those they spend maximum time with—family and friends. The microsystem closest to the individual contains the strongest influences and encompasses interactions and relationships in immediate surroundings.
Example: Maternal education strongly influences childhood immunization uptake. The behavioral patterns observed in close proximity—how family members approach supporting vulnerable populations during a pandemic—will impact the individual's decision-making.
SBCC Tactics: Family counseling, peer educator programs, Self-Help Group integration, interpersonal communication, home visits, support groups.
3ļøāƒ£ CommunityDescription: This refers to influences from the situational context in which the individual lives and in which social relationships are nested. Characteristics include leadership, access to information, service provision, social capital, and collective efficacy.
Example: Individuals are more likely to practice desired behaviors if leaders who have influence on the community promote them—like gram panchayat heads, religious leaders, or local authorities organizing awareness drives.
SBCC Tactics: Community mobilization, village health and nutrition days, community events, local leader engagement, social marketing, street theater, community radio.
4ļøāƒ£ Social/Structural
(Enabling Environment)
Description: This refers to the larger, macro-level environment which can either promote or deter behaviors—health systems, resources and services, policies, guidance and protocols, religious and cultural values, media and technology, gender norms, and income equity.
Example: During an outbreak, individuals are more likely to engage in desired behaviors if facilities exist that support those behaviors, if coordination mechanisms are in place, and if bylaws and policies are introduced to promote supportive norms.
SBCC Tactics: Policy advocacy, mass media campaigns, social norms marketing, systems strengthening, public-private partnerships, regulatory frameworks.

Important: Effective SBCC interventions should aim to develop messages and activities that influence all four levels of the Social-Ecological Model, maximizing the facilitators and limiting the barriers. However, it is unlikely for one single organization to operate at all four levels, as these require different skills, strategies, and approaches. Coordination and partnerships with institutions operating at different levels are therefore necessary for a comprehensive SBCC approach.

SBCC Communication Channels & Approaches

Mass Media

• Radio & Television • Billboards & Print • Social Media • Internet & Websites • Entertainment Education • Public Service Announcements

Interpersonal

• Client-Provider Interaction • Group Presentations • Home Visits • Counseling Sessions • Peer Education • Support Groups • mHealth Audio Messages

Community Mobilization

• Community Events • Village Health Days • Street Theater • Local Leader Engagement • Self-Help Groups • Community Radio • Participatory Videos

How to Implement SBCC: A Systematic Framework

SBCC takes a methodical approach which begins with primary research of specific social settings and behavioral analysis, progresses through communication design, execution, monitoring, and evaluation. Here is a comprehensive 12-step implementation framework:

Step 1: Identify Program Goals

Define clear, measurable objectives linked to desired health or development outcomes. What specific behaviors need to change?

Step 2: Involve Stakeholders

Map and engage all stakeholders—government, community leaders, health providers, civil society, and beneficiaries themselves.

Step 3: Identify Target Beneficiaries

Define primary, secondary, and tertiary audiences. Who needs to change behavior? Who influences them?

Step 4: Conduct Formative Research

Assess needs, knowledge gaps, barriers, facilitators, and existing communication pathways through situational analysis.

Step 5: Segment Target Populations

Group audiences by demographics, behaviors, vulnerabilities, and communication preferences for tailored approaches.

Step 6: Define Behavior Change Objectives

Specify measurable changes in knowledge, attitudes, and practices for each audience segment.

Step 7: Design SBCC Strategy & M&E Plan

Select appropriate channels, develop Theory of Change, create monitoring indicators, and design evaluation framework.

Step 8: Develop Communication Products

Create messages, materials, and activities informed by formative research. Use human-centered design principles.

Step 9: Pretest Materials

Test messages and materials with intended audience to identify improvements before full implementation.

Step 10: Implement & Monitor

Roll out activities while continuously tracking implementation fidelity, reach, and intermediate outcomes.

Step 11: Evaluate Impact

Measure behavioral and health outcomes against baseline. Document what worked, for whom, and under what conditions.

Step 12: Analyze Feedback & Revise

Use evidence to refine and improve strategies. Document lessons learned for future interventions and scaling.

Key Considerations for SBCC Strategy Design

  • Vulnerability/risk factors of the target group to be addressed
  • Conflicts and obstacles in the way to the desired change in behavior
  • Type of message and communication media which can best reach the target group
  • Type of resources available and assessment of existing knowledge
  • Demographics, literacy levels, digital access, media consumption, and trust in information sources

SBCC During Outbreaks, Emergencies & Disasters

During disease outbreaks and emergencies, specific actions are required of affected communities for prevention, containment, and control. Communities need to be informed, motivated, and equipped to practice necessary protective behaviors. This specialized form of SBCC is called Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE)—a core capacity under the International Health Regulations (IHR 2005).

āš ļø Lesson from Ebola 2014: The tragic Ebola virus outbreak in West Africa demonstrated that lack of adequate and appropriate communication early in the response fueled fear, panic, and denial; spread misconceptions and rumors; and contributed to further spread of the disease. If an emergency response does not include strategically applied communication activities, it is unlikely to succeed.

Critical RCCE Functions
  • āœ… Provide accurate, clear, relevant, and timely information on how to contain an emergency
  • āœ… Make communities aware of ways to protect themselves and their families
  • āœ… Identify and address myths and misconceptions that may lead to detrimental practices
  • āœ… Maintain public trust in health authorities and responders
  • āœ… Prepare communities for emergency response actions
  • āœ… Support communities and countries to recover and rebuild after emergencies

SBCC has been acknowledged as a key element of any crisis or emergency preparedness plan and should be integrated into all stages of emergency response—from prevention and preparedness through to crisis response and recovery. Key RCCE pillars include: Coordination, Community Mobilization and Action, Message Development and Dissemination, Capacity Development, and Monitoring & Evaluation.

Why is SBCC Important for Children?

Improving service accessibility to social infrastructure does not inevitably promote a needy family's well-being. Caregivers may struggle to access resources designed to aid their children. The worth of a social scheme isn't always apparent—at times it fails to address an underlying issue or an invisible barrier to access.

Parents may choose not to send their adolescent children to school, or may choose not to vaccinate their children due to lack of awareness. Parents act in this manner not out of malice or lack of knowledge, but because the context of their decision extends beyond the aim of the programs intended to assist them.

The majority of the deprivations that children face are symptomatic of deeper issues—such as deeply ingrained power imbalances or beliefs that manifest themselves through destructive behaviors and discriminatory institutions. In such circumstances, safeguarding children's rights entails altering the mechanisms that govern how societies share power.

How Responsenet Practices Social and Behavior Change

Responsenet believes that altering the source of knowledge alone will not result in behavioral changes. We collaborate with families and community leaders to understand their needs and motivations, discover their strengths, and remove barriers to positive change. Our SBCC programs across various social sectors all over India combine local expertise with scientific ideas to help the most disadvantaged.

šŸ”¬ Applied Developmental Psychology

We apply methodologies from applied developmental psychology, grounding our interventions in scientific understanding of how humans learn and change.

šŸŽØ Human-Centered Design

We create human-centered designs to implement research and create the change that families believe is most important—not what outsiders assume they need.

šŸ‘„ Community Participation

Communication and community participation remain key to our work. We work actively with women and children to deepen their roles in building the communities they deserve.

āš–ļø Social Transformation

We envision societies where fairness reigns and discrimination fades away. We encourage involvement and responsibility to give families greater influence over decisions affecting their lives.

We don't seek to change people; we strive to change the conditions in which they act, making it simpler for individuals and communities to embrace their rights and duties. Ultimately, their own voices contribute to real changes. Responsenet has been a leader in social and behavioral change for over 17 years with a strong organizational workforce on the ground.

SBCC Application Areas

šŸ„ Health & Nutrition

Maternal-child health, immunization, family planning, infectious disease prevention, nutrition practices

šŸ’§ WASH

Handwashing, safe water treatment, sanitation practices, menstrual hygiene, ODF sustainability

šŸ“š Education

School enrollment, attendance, early childhood development, girl child education, parent engagement

šŸ›”ļø Child Protection

Child marriage prevention, child labor elimination, violence prevention, birth registration

āš–ļø Gender Equality

Women's empowerment, ending FGM, gender-based violence prevention, equal opportunity

🚨 Emergency Response

Disease outbreak communication, disaster preparedness, risk communication, infodemic management

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: What is the difference between SBCC and traditional IEC (Information-Education-Communication)?

Traditional IEC focused primarily on materials production and one-way dissemination of information. SBCC goes beyond this to strategically designed, evidence-based interventions informed by behavioral science. SBCC recognizes that information alone doesn't change behavior—it requires addressing social norms, structural barriers, and creating supportive environments. SBCC is interactive, requires two-way communication with feedback loops, and is grounded in behavioral theories like the Social Ecological Model.

Q2: What is the Social Ecological Model and why is it important for SBCC?

The Social Ecological Model (SEM), based on Urie Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory from 1979, recognizes that individuals develop within a network of relationships and nested environmental systems. It identifies four levels of influence on behavior: Individual (personal traits, knowledge, attitudes), Interpersonal (family and peer networks), Community (leadership, social capital, services), and Structural/Enabling Environment (policies, systems, cultural values). Effective SBCC must address all four levels because behaviors are shaped by multiple interacting factors—not just individual knowledge.

Q3: What is Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE)?

RCCE is the specialized form of SBCC used during public health emergencies and disasters. Risk Communication is the real-time exchange of information, advice, and opinions between experts/officials and people facing a hazard, enabling informed decisions to mitigate threats. Community Engagement develops relationships and structures that engage communities as equal partners in creating acceptable emergency response solutions. RCCE is a core capacity of the International Health Regulations (IHR 2005) and is essential throughout all phases of emergency management—prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery.

Q4: What communication channels are used in SBCC?

SBCC uses three broad categories of channels: Mass Media (radio, television, billboards, print materials, social media, internet, entertainment education), Interpersonal Communication (client-provider interaction, group presentations, home visits, counseling, peer education, mHealth audio messages), and Community Mobilization (community events, village health days, street theater, local leader engagement, Self-Help Groups, community radio, participatory videos). The optimal mix depends on target audience characteristics, literacy levels, media consumption patterns, digital access, and trust in different information sources.

Q5: What evidence exists for SBCC effectiveness?

SBCC has proven effective in several health areas: increasing use of family planning methods, reducing spread of malaria and other infectious diseases, improving newborn and maternal health, and strengthening vaccination uptake. Studies show that SBCC interventions combining face-to-face and mHealth strategies significantly improve health knowledge—in one India study, 11 of 13 intermediate outcomes showed significantly higher basic health knowledge among intervention groups. However, SBCC alone rarely achieves results without addressing structural barriers. Political will and stakeholder buy-in are critical success factors, as demonstrated during COVID-19 response.

Q6: How long does it take to see results from SBCC programs?

SBCC operates along a continuum of change: Unaware → Aware → Concerned → Knowledgeable → Motivated to change → Practicing trial behavior → Sustained behavior change. Short-term (3-6 months) can achieve awareness and knowledge gains. Medium-term (6-18 months) can achieve attitude shifts and trial behaviors. Long-term (2-5+ years) is typically required for sustained behavior change and social norm shifts. Complex challenges like child marriage or FGM with deep roots require longer-term interventions because even robust communication campaigns cannot quickly overpower deeply ingrained social norms and belief systems.

Q7: Why did Responsenet shift from 'changing people' to 'changing conditions'?

Research and field experience showed that altering knowledge alone does not result in behavioral changes. Behavior is influenced by motivation from others (external influence) and from within oneself (internal influence), plus structural factors beyond individual control. By focusing on changing conditions—the environment, social norms, service availability, policy support, and community leadership—we make it simpler for individuals and communities to embrace their rights and duties. This ecological approach acknowledges that people make decisions within contexts that either support or hinder healthy choices.

Q8: How does SBCC work with Self-Help Groups (SHGs)?

SHGs and Support Groups are increasingly recognized as effective mechanisms for improving maternal and child nutrition due to their decentralized, community-based structures. SBC interventions delivered through SHGs include peer-to-peer learning, interpersonal communication, home visits, and community meetings. Research from India, Bangladesh, and Vietnam shows SHG-based interventions improved knowledge of breastfeeding, complementary feeding, and dietary diversity. Challenges include sustaining participation, overcoming socio-cultural barriers, and logistical difficulties in reaching remote areas. Jeevika in Bihar expanded from 101 to 300 blocks integrating food, nutrition, and health initiatives through SHGs.

Q9: What role does technology play in modern SBCC?

Technology is increasingly important for SBCC, particularly mHealth (mobile health) interventions. Examples include: pushed audio messages via mobile phones suitable for disadvantaged populations with low literacy, AI chatbots like UNICEF Brazil's 'Pode Falar' for adolescent mental health (734,991 messages exchanged in first year), social media campaigns for awareness and engagement, and voice boxes at merchant points announcing payment receipts. However, evidence for digital and mass-media tools remains limited and requires more high-quality research given increasing digital penetration alongside widening gender-based gaps in technology access.

Q10: How is SBCC monitored and evaluated?

Effective SBCC M&E tracks multiple levels: Reach (how many people were exposed), Engagement (how actively they participated), Knowledge/Attitude changes (intermediate outcomes), Behavioral changes (practice of desired behaviors), and Health/Development outcomes (ultimate impact). Challenges include establishing control groups for mass media interventions and attributing population-level changes to specific interventions. Best practice involves baseline and follow-up surveys measuring ideational variables representing sequential steps toward behavior change, plus process monitoring of implementation fidelity. The transtheoretical model of behavior change helps map progress along stages.

Q11: What makes SBCC effective during disease outbreaks?

Scoping reviews of SBCC during Ebola, COVID-19, monkeypox, and cholera identified key success factors: Political will and leadership ownership is essential—without it, even well-designed programs fail. Community engagement must treat communities as equal partners, not passive recipients. Infodemic management (addressing misinformation/disinformation) has become increasingly important. Behavioral data generation enables data-driven, adaptive interventions. Messages must be accurate, clear, relevant, timely, accessible, and actionable. Trust-building is fundamental—communities are more likely to adopt protective behaviors when they trust the source.

Q12: Why can't one organization operate at all four SEM levels?

Each level of the Social Ecological Model requires different skills, strategies, and approaches. Individual-level work requires counseling and education expertise. Interpersonal work requires group facilitation and peer education skills. Community-level work requires mobilization and leadership engagement capabilities. Structural-level work requires policy advocacy and systems strengthening expertise. Different organizations specialize in different levels. Therefore, coordination and partnerships with institutions operating at different levels are necessary for a comprehensive SBCC approach. This is why multi-stakeholder collaboration is fundamental to effective SBCC.

Q13: What is human-centered design in SBCC?

Human-centered design (HCD) is an approach that puts the end-users at the center of the design process. In SBCC, this means: deeply understanding the lived experiences, needs, and motivations of target communities; involving community members in co-creating solutions rather than imposing externally designed interventions; iteratively testing and refining materials and approaches based on community feedback; designing for the actual context in which people make decisions, not idealized scenarios. Responsenet implements research to create the change that families believe is most important—recognizing that communities know their own challenges best.

Q14: How does SBCC address deeply ingrained social norms?

Complex challenges like child marriage, FGM, or gender-based violence have deep roots in social norms and belief systems that even robust communication campaigns cannot quickly overpower. SBCC addresses these through: engaging influential community leaders and gatekeepers who can shift collective expectations; creating positive deviance—highlighting community members who have successfully adopted alternative behaviors; facilitating community dialogue that allows questioning of harmful norms in safe spaces; working across multiple generations since norms are transmitted intergenerationally; sustained long-term engagement rather than short-term campaigns; and addressing the underlying power imbalances that perpetuate harmful practices.

Q15: How can organizations partner with Responsenet for SBCC programs?

Responsenet has been a leader in social and behavioral change for over 17 years with a strong organizational workforce on the ground across India. We combine local expertise with scientific methodologies from applied developmental psychology. Our SBCC programs span health, nutrition, WASH, education, child protection, gender equality, and emergency response. We partner with corporations for CSR programs, with government for scheme implementation, and with development agencies for research and scaling. Contact us at [email protected] or call +91 9910737524 / 9810007524 to discuss how SBCC can support your development objectives.

Transform Behaviors. Transform Communities. Transform Lives.

Since 2007 Responsenet combines decades of SBCC expertise with human-centered design and applied developmental psychology to create lasting social change. Whether you're addressing health, education, WASH, child protection, or emergency response, our evidence-based approaches deliver measurable outcomes.

Partner for Impactful SBCC Programs

Don't just inform. Transform. Responsenet offers end-to-end C4D and SBCC implementation—evidence-based, human-centered, and designed for lasting social change across health, education, and development sectors.

šŸ“§ Email Now: [email protected]

šŸ“ž Call Now: +91 9910737524 / 9810007524

Communication for Development | Social and Behavior Change | 22 States

—

Responsenet | Communication for Development | Social and Behavior Change

www.responsenet.org | Since 2007 | 22 States | Transforming Conditions, Not Just Knowledge